Tackling the AI Paradox at the Tactical Edge

June 15, 2020

Tackling the AI Paradox at the Tactical Edge

Published in Military Embedded Systems
Written by Emma Helfrich

Artificial intelligence (AI), as the general public understands it, is frequently associated with alluring – and sometimes alarming – ideas of talking robots, champion chess-playing computers, and sentient technology humans shouldn’t trust. In the defense industry, however, AI is on the path to becoming a loyal companion to the warfighter and manufacturers alike. As technology progresses, so does the range of defense capabilities that AI could not only supplement but eventually manage.

Artificial intelligence – which we humans have chummily shortened to AI – is everywhere. Facial recognition on your phone, predictive technology used by Netflix, Amazon’s Alexa: all of these capabilities are powered by machine learning. These technologies aren’t necessarily as enticing as Hollywood makes AI out to be, but they do exert a major influence on the direction of military AI.

The way that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) treats both the discussion and utilization of AI depends heavily on the definition of it, which can be subjective. This ties in with what industry professionals have dubbed the AI Paradox: As soon as a capability has been proven to work, it’s no longer considered AI.

Autopilot and fly-by-wire aircraft both use AI but are hardly ever regarded as such. Today, autopilot is thought of as its own capability, with fly-by-wire also its own separate thing. What results is a skewed perception of just how many platforms in the military take advantage of AI and machine learning in day-to-day operations.

What this paradox could also be translated into is simply an integration of AI so seamlessly that an entirely new capability is now at the military’s disposal. With these advancements, however, come design obstacles that manufacturers face when considering processing power, environment, funding, and the commercial world.

What defines military AI

In order to understand where military AI has been/is going, let’s actually define AI. AI and autonomy, commonly referred to in the same vein, are not quite synonymous. AI is what is needed to enable autonomy, as without it a machine couldn’t become fully autonomous. That being said, AI itself is similarly defined by a specific set of characteristics.

Read the full article.

Related Products

SFF Mission Computers  
SFF Mission Computers

with NVIDIA GPGPU processing

Processor Cards  
Processor Cards

Intel Xeon D-based High Performance Processor Cards

GPGPU Processor Cards  
GPGPU Processor Cards

TFLOPS processing capability alongside maximum memory bandwidth for the most compute-intensive tasks.

Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Defense and Aerospace Applications

Read the white paper to learn more.

  • The terminology: machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence
  • Exploring defense and aerospace applications
  • Understanding the challenges and technology enablers
  • Choosing the right partner for success

Comparing CPUs and GPUs for Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Which is better for machine learning applications, 2nd Generation Intel Xeon Scalable Processors or NVIDIA’s T4? A head-to-head comparison helps explain whether you should choose a CPU or a GPU for your high-performance machine learning solution.